Archive for the ‘Film Review’ Category

SINNERS: 4 STARS. “delivers on both the pulpy and poignant aspects of the story.”

SYNOPSIS: In “Sinners,” a new Southern Gothic now playing in theatres, Michael B. Jordan stars in a dual role as twin brothers Smoke and Stack, World War I veterans who came of age as part of Al Capone’s gang in Chicago. With a bag of Capone cash, some illegal prohibition hootch and a hope for a new beginning, they buy an old sawmill in their Southern, Jim Crow-segregated hometown with the intention of opening a juke joint. When Remmick (Jack O’Connell) shows up at their door, they are exposed to an evil like they’ve never experienced before. “You keep dancing with the devil,” says a preacher, “one day he’s going to follow you home.”

CAST: Michael B. Jordan, Hailee Steinfeld, Miles Caton, Jack O’Connell, Wunmi Mosaku, Jayme Lawson, Omar Miller, Li Jun Li, and Delroy Lindo. Directed by Ryan Coogler.

REVIEW: Rich in detail, ambitious in its themes and knee deep in blood, “Sinners” defies easy categorization. Director Ryan Coogler calls the movie mashup “genre fluid,” and even that clever descriptor doesn’t come close to capturing the width and breadth of the story.

What begins as a portrait of brotherly ambition in the Jim Crow South broadens to become a story of building community, the spiritual impact of music and racism filtered through a Southern Gothic lens. That it is also a kickass vampire flick, with overtones of African folklore, doesn’t feel like an overstep. Great speculative fiction is never only about the scares or the monsters; they are comments on the society in which they are set. Coogler’s vampires are bloodthirsty predators hell bent on consuming the cultural identity of Smoke, Stack and their Juke Joint customers.

The film’s climax, (SLIGHT SPOILER) a battle between humans and vampires isn’t simply a blood splattered way to bring the movie to a close. In context, it’s a fight for survival, both physical and cultural. The vampires are, of course, supernatural creatures, but the threat they represent feels all too human.

It’s heady stuff wrapped up in an entertaining package. Coogler regular Michael B. Jordan—their previous films include “Fruitvale Station,” “Creed,” “Black Panther” and “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever”—impresses in the dual role of twin brothers. As Smoke he’s hardened, quick to temper. His take on Stack reveals a softer, more hopeful side. In totality it’s seamless work that doesn’t feel like a gimmick.

“Sinners” is ambitious, audacious and while it may rely a bit too heavily on flashbacks and feels like it goes a step or two too far to find its resolution, the boldness of its filmmaking delivers on both the pulpy and poignant aspects of the story.

 

ONE TO ONE: JOHN & YOKO: 4 STARS. “an immersive look at activism in the early 1970s.”

SYNOPSIS: “One to One: John & Yoko,” a new documentary now playing on IMAX and in theatres, is a look at New York City in the early 1970s through the actions of two of its most famous residents, John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

CAST: John Lennon, Yoko Ono, Richard Nixon, Jerry Rubin, Alan Ginsberg, George McGovern. Co-directed by Kevin Macdonald and Sam Rice-Edwards.

REVIEW: “One to One: John & Yoko” isn’t a traditional documentary. There is plenty of archival footage, but no interviews or narration. Instead, it’s a feel. Through never-before-seen concert and news footage co-directors Kevin Macdonald and Sam Rice-Edwards create an immersive look at activism in the early 1970s, seen through the lens of John Lennon and Yoko Ono’s political engagement.

Before John and Yoko moved to the Upper West Side of Manhattan and their famous address at The Dakota Building, they lived in a small two-room apartment at 105 Bank Street in Greenwich Village, rented from Joe Butler of the Lovin’ Spoonful. Tucked away on a cobblestone street, for eighteen months (until a home invasion prompted a move to the more secure Dakota), roughly 1971 to 1973, the apartment became a counterculture hub for musicians and anti-Vietnam War activists.

While Lennon and Ono were consorting with the likes of Yippie leader Jerry Rubin, Black Panther co-founder Bobby Seale and “Howl” poet Allen Ginsberg, they also attracted the attention of FBI head J. Edgar Hoover and the Immigration and Naturalization Service who ordered the musician’s deportation based on alleged Communist ties.

It’s this tumultuous time that Macdonald and Rice-Edwards explore in a film that feels like flipping through the television channels of the day. It’s a style, Macdonald says, inspired by Lennon’s obsessive television watching in the tiny apartment. Lennon absorbed pop and political culture through TV and “One to One: John & Yoko” replicates the feeling of watching the tube with someone with an itchy finger on the remote.

Newly restored footage, with remastered audio overseen by Sean Ono Lennon, of Lennon’s only full-length, post-Beatles concert is intercut with talk show appearance, home movies and news accounts to create a sense of time and place.

Most revealing are phone calls recorded by John and Yoko. During their surveillance by the Feds the couple began recording all their phone calls just in case they needed them as evidence in a court case. The concert footage, which is spectacular, grabs the eye, but it is the phone calls that provide the most fodder for Berratle fans.

From the heartfelt—Yoko talking about the break-up of the Beatles—to the bizarre—there’s a lot of talk of collecting house flies for an art installation—to the political—Lennon floating an idea to raise bail money through ticket sales—and the personal—Lennon’s attempts to get Bob Dylan “garbologist” A.J. Weberman to stop sifting through the folk icon’s garbage—the calls provide a close-up-and-personal portrait of John and Yoko at that time.

“One To One: John & Yoko” captures the aura of a chaotic time for the couple, both personally and professionally, as the couple struggled to find their place in a complicated world. “OK, so flower power didn’t work,” Lennon says. “So what? We start again.”

Abstract in its presentation, but immersive in its effect, it’s a must for Beatle completists who will get a charge out of “new” versions of “Come Together,” “Instant Karma” and “Hound Dog,” while poli-sci students who just might see parallels between the unrest of the 1970s and today.

THE WEDDING BANQUET: 3 ½ STARS. “rom com tempered by real emotion.”

SYNOPSIS: In “The Wedding Baquet,” a new romantic dramedy starring Bowen Yang and Lily Gladstone, and now playing in theatres, two couples come up with an unusual arrangement. Lee (Lily Gladstone) and Angela (Kelly Marie Tran) are trying to have a baby but can’t afford another round of IVF treatment. Their landlords, Min (Han Gi-chan), whose student visa is set to expire, and Chris (Bowen Yang), his commitment-phobe boyfriend, are having a rocky patch. Min wants to get married, but Chris is hesitant. In exchange for the money for more IVF Angela agrees to a marriage of convenience with Min, who’ll then get his Green Card. The plan is complicated when Min’s rich grandmother (“Minari” Oscar-winner Youn Yuh-jung), who doesn’t know Min is gay, unexpectedly arrives for a visit. “If my grandmother thinks your marrying me for money,” Moin says, “she’ll blow the whole thing up.”

CAST: Bowen Yang, Lily Gladstone, Kelly Marie Tran, Han Gi-chan, Joan Chen, Youn Yuh-jung. Directed by Andrew Ahn who co-wrote the script with James Schamus.

REVIEW: A modern update of Ang Lee’s 1993 Oscar-nominated film of the same name, the new movie features all the standard rom com flourishes. There’s the usual miscommunications, physical comedy and romantic antics but they are tempered by emotion that elevates “The Wedding Banquet” from rom com to, if not drama, at least a low-key dramedy, heavy on the poignant moments.

The tonal switches are made believable by a talented cast. The scenes between Lee and Angela, Lily Gladstone and Kelly Marie Tran, have a warm, lived-in feel that reveals their deep connection. Ditto the connection between Angela and her mother (Joan Chen). It’s a shame we don’t get more scenes of the dynamic between mother and daughter.

Best of all is a late movie scene between Min and his grandmother, played by Youn Yuh-jung. Youn brings warmth, humour and understanding to a scene that could easily have slipped into melodrama.

“The Wedding Banquet” nicely updates the original’s (which Schamus co-wrote) take on the modern vs. the traditional and does so with a great deal of heart. It winds up with a rushed ending, but rom coms, even ones with a serious edge, are never about the destination. We know how these movies will end. They’re about the journey and “The Wedding Banquet” is a fun ride.

QUEEN OF THE RING: 2 STARS. “no peaks and valleys, just peaks.”

SYNOPSIS: “Queen of the Ring,” a new sports drama now playing on theatres, is the (mostly) true story of Mildred Burke, a female wrestler who defied skeptics to become a champion when all-girl wrestling was banned in most of America. “I can’t sing and I can’t dance,” she says, “but I can tell a story and beat some ass.”

CAST: Emily Bett Rickards, Josh Lucas, Tyler Posey, Francesca Eastwood, Marie Avgeropoulos, Deborah Ann Woll, Cara Buono, Adam Demos, Martin Kove, Kelli Berglund, Damaris Lewis, Gavin Casalegno, Walton Goggins, Mildred Burke. Directed by Ash Avildsen.

REVIEW: Mildred Burke (Canadian actor Emily Bett Rickards) is a pioneer in wrestling history. A three-time women’s world champion she was the queen of the ring and enjoyed a career that was anything but standard. It’s a shame then, that her biopic, “Queen of the Ring” is such a straightforward affair.

Director Ash Avildsen (son of “Rocky” director John G. Avildsen), working from his own script, never met an inspirational moment he couldn’t heighten. According to “Queen of the Ring” Burke’s every move, in and out of the ring, is worthy of a fist pump and some stirring music on the soundtrack. There are no peaks and valleys. Even when she faces hardship there’s just peaks, which blunts the effectiveness of the film as a hero’s story.

The result is a cartoonish portrait that doesn’t feel authentic.

BOOZE & REVIEWS: HOW DID AN ARMY CAPTAIN INSPIRE A CLASSIC COCKTAIL?

I join the Bell Media Radio Network national night time show “Shane Hewitt and the Night Shift” for “Booze & Reviews!” This week I review the gritty “Warfare” and then answer the question, How did an army captain inspire a classic cocktail?

Listen as Shane and I talk about KFC flavoured toothpaste and the chicken jockey phenomenon HERE!

Then, on Booze & Reviews listen as I talk about how an army captain inspired a classic cocktail HERE!

YOU TUBE: THREE MOVIES/THIRTY SECONDS! FAST REVIEWS FOR BUSY PEOPLE!

Fast reviews for busy people! Watch as I review three movies in less time than it takes to do a high five! Have a look as I race against the clock to pickup what “Drop” is putting down, and tell you about the dramas “Warfare” and “The Amateur.”

Watch the whole thing HERE!

DROP: 4 STARS. “The story of the worst—but perhaps most memorable—first date ever.”

SYNOPSIS: In “Drop,” a darkly comedic new thriller now playing in theatres, Meghann Fahy plays a widow whose first date in years takes a strange turn when someone named Let’s Play “drops” a series of mysterious messages on her phone that threaten the lives of her sister, son and date. “You gotta be within fifty feet to send a drop,” says her date, Henry. “It’s someone in this restaurant.”

CAST: Meghann Fahy, Brandon Sklenar, Violett Beane, Jacob Robinson, Reed Diamond, Gabrielle Ryan Spring, Jeffery Self, Ed Weeks, Travis Nelson. Directed by Christopher Landon.

REVIEW: Not since the high-flying blackmail of Wes Craven’s “Red Eye” has a movie embraced its unlikely premise with such conviction.

The story of the worst—but perhaps most memorable—first date ever, fully commits to its story of technical and psychological warfare, no matter how silly the situation gets.

Action-packed, “Drop” is not. Director Christopher Landon trusts the “WWYD?—What Would You Do?— situation and the characters to carry the show as Violet (Meghann Fahy) tries to follow the crazy, texted demands clogging up her phone without alerting her date (Brandon Sklenar). With stylish photography—including some splashy Hitchcock inspired visuals—and the sparkling chemistry between Fahy and Sklenar, the director crafts a rollercoaster ride of a movie.

So, as a viewer, it’s best to leave your disbelief at the concession stand. If you can do that, “Drop” will be a darkly fun and tension filled story that pays off just before you fall off the edge of your seat.

If not, you may find yourself wondering why Henry didn’t hightail it out of there after the first text.

WARFARE: 4 STARS. “immerses the viewer in a world of violence.”

SYNOPSIS: Based on ex-Navy Seal Ray Mendoza’s real-life experiences during the Iraq War, “Warfare, now playing in theatres, is a harrowing portrait of modern warfare that sees a platoon of American Navy SEALs in battle with enemy combatants.

CAST: D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai, Will Poulter, Cosmo Jarvis, Kit Connor, Finn Bennett, Taylor John Smith, Michael Gandolfini. Directed by Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland.

REVIEW: “Warfare” is not a movie you “enjoy.” It’s one you experience.

Created from the memories of the actual combatants, “Warfare” is a gut-wrenching recreation of the Navy SEALs who oversaw the movement of U.S. forces through insurgent territory in Iraq in 2006.

It’s a visceral slice-of-life-and-death that strips away all the pretence of war movies by highlighting the sacrifices made by the Seals. The up-close-and-personal combat sequences provide an interesting take on warfare. The battle scenes are visceral, “you-are-there” in nature, with visuals of dismembered limbs and carnage that would make Hieronymus Bosch turn his face away, but it is the portrait of the personal toll paid by the soldiers that resonates.

The first half hour is all about quiet, nervous expectation as the soldiers prepare for the onslaught to come. Once shots are exchanged, it becomes a visceral, boots-on-the-ground story of modern warfare, told in real time.

A bomb blast leaves soldiers on fire, mutilated and screaming in agony. These scenes, which make up the majority of the film’s running time, are gorier than most horror films and left me jarred, unable to shake the intensity of the experience.

Am I glad I saw “Warfare”? Yes. Would I want to sit through it again? Hell no. It’s an antiwar film that very effectively makes its point by immersing the viewer in a world of violence. Not an easy watch, but it isn’t meant to be.