Posts Tagged ‘Civil War’

LOOKING BACK AT 2024: THE “NAUGHTY” AND “NICE” LISTS! FIRST THE NICE!

I take a look back at the year that was at the movies. From a chimp who becomes a pop superstar and a 93-year-old action star to an all-singing-all-dancing villain and an enormous elf, the movies gifted us the best and worst–the naughty and nice, the champagne and lumps of coal–of what Hollywood and elsewhere has to offer.

Here is the Nice List, a compendium of the very best films of the year, presented alphabetically.

Instead of attempting to unwind Dylan’s mystique, “A Complete Unknown” director James Mangold, who co-wrote the screenplay with Jay Cocks, wisely opts for a portrait of the time, the America and, in microcosm, the Greenwich Village folk era, that produced the singer. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the battle for civil rights indirectly hang heavy over the film, completing the portrait of the time that fuelled Dylan’s early work.  The back-to-basics approach benefits the movie, allowing Timothée Chalamet’s tour de force lead performance to shine.

“A Different Man” is a singular movie. Schimberg digs deep to examine the skin-deep notions of attractiveness, and the effect of beauty on the eye of the beholder.

Part screwball comedy, part fight for survival, “Anora” is a triumph of controlled chaos. As in his earlier films, “Tangerine,” “The Florida Project” and “Red Rocket,” director Sean Baker keenly observes his characters with empathy and emotion in stories that examine money, class, and power. An insightfully made look at the wealth divide, with elements of suspense and comedy, it never fails to entertain.

“Better Man,” the biopic of Take That singer-turned-solo superstar Robbie Williams is a sex, drugs and British Pop story given an audacious treatment by “The Greatest Showman” director Michael Gracey. A surreal mix of “Behind the Music” and “Planet of the Apes,” it is a raw portrayal of the singer’s vulnerabilities and foibles in which he’s rendered throughout as a CGI monkey. No explanations are offered, and none are needed. Whether it’s a comment on the performing monkey nature of his work, or his ever-evolving emotional state, or whatever, it’s a startling and surprisingly effective gimmick in a wildly entertaining film.

The flirty, intimate and indulgent “Challengers” is a ménage à trois of ever shifting power games, mind games and tennis gameplay in which the power dynamics are batted back-and-forth, just like in a real tennis match.

There are no monsters or supernatural aspects in “Civil War,” but make no mistake, this is a horror film. The horrors of war are detailed in a visceral and chaotic way but it is the idea of a societal collapse that haunts.

“Conclave” has a hushed, restrained feel, but even though the characters all carry bibles as they walk the ecclesiastical halls, director Edward Berger understands this story is more pulpy thriller than holy book.

If the word bombastic took steroids it might come close to describing the R-rated “Deadpool & Wolverine.” Filled with fan service, it’s a good time, even if the experience of watching it sometimes feels like being on the inside of a blender set to puree.

“Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga” is a high-octane apocalyptic tale with a fierce Anya Taylor-Joy and Chris Hemsworth as a charismatic warlord, that features action scenes that’ll make your eyes pop out of their sockets.

“The Greatest Night in Pop” doesn’t reinvent the music documentary wheel, but it is more than a star-studded episode of I Love the 80s as it vividly captures the remarkable effort and magic that went into the recording of We Are the World. 

Make no mistake, “Hey, Viktor!” is a comedy, first and foremost, and a raunchy one at that, but as it works its way to the end, it careens through a dysfunctional journey of self-discovery. 

“Hit Man” is a rom com and a caper comedy with some thrilling twists, anchored by a smart script that acts as a showcase for the lead performances from Glen Powell and Adria Arjona.

“Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” is jam packed with big ideas and even bigger action scenes but feels intimate because of its emotional content.

A closer look at the remastered “Let It Be,” free from the furor of the break-up that coloured the 1970 release, reveals the shared joy of creation.

Romance and ‘roid rage collide in “Love Lies Bleeding,” a pulpy romp that is a bloody and brutal twist on the neo noir that harkens back to films like “Wild at Heart” and early Coen bros.

Despite a title that suggests a 1990s teen comedy, “My Old Ass” is a surreal coming-of-age story that stays anchored to reality with natural, heartfelt performances and a great deal of humor.

“Nosferatu” will be categorized as a horror film, and there are elements of gore, death and the unnerving auditory experience of hearing Count Orlock drain his victims, but it is an old-school horror movie that aims to unnerve its audience with just a few jump scares and no vats of fake blood. Eggers conveys terror with the film’s atmosphere of dread and depiction of madness, decay and unrelenting, elemental evil

“The Piano Lesson” is crisply complex, a tangle of emotion, the paranormal and family dynamics, with characters so carefully written each of them could be the star of their own story.

Younger audience members should enjoy the characters and the animation in “Robot Dreams,” but there is a depth to the story that will strike adults differently.

Because the uplift and empathy on display is such a departure for a prison movie, it would be easy to be cynical about a movie like “Sing Sing.” But it is impossible to deny the crowd-pleasing universal story of the redemptive power of art and community.

Clever and subversive, “Strange Darling” is an expertly made exercise in nihilism. What begins as a standard serial killer flick soon widens and deepens to become a thought provoking, provocative rethink of the whole genre.

“The Substance” goes on a bit too long, but director Coralie Fargeat’s gruesome vision, and the finale’s ankle-deep bloodbath, is a thing of terrible beauty.

“Suze” is a funny, never-judge-a-book-by-its-cover dramedy, that succeeds because of its engaging lead performances and in the way it presents a platonic relationship based on mutual respect.

“Thelma” is something you don’t see very often, a thriller starring a 93-year-old action hero. The fantastic June Squibb, in the lead role, may not exactly be Ethan Hunt, but she’s more endearing and delightful than Jack Ryan and Jason Bourne combined.

A mixture of nostalgia and hard-edged reality, of bittersweet poetry and heartfelt relationships, “We Grown Now” is a nuanced look at the ties that bind and their importance, even when those ties begin to fray.

Part rom com and part essay on what lingers after we’re gone, “We Live in Time” is a five-hankie tear-jerker fueled by the intimate and charismatic performances of its leads Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield.

The animated “The Wild Robot” will put you in the mind of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial and WALL-E, but carves out its own, unique, rewarding space andhas the makings of a classic.

CIVIL WAR SCREENING: RICHARD HOUSTS LIVE Q&A WITH DIRECTOR ALEX GARLAND!

I hosted a special IMAX screening of “Civil War,” a new antiwar film. set in a dystopian future America, in which a team of military-embedded journalists race against time to reach Washington, D.C., before rebel factions descend upon the White House. AP calls it the “year’s most explosive movie,” while the Toronto Star calls it “the year’s most divisive movie.” 

Director Alex garland joined me after the screening for a twenty minute Q&A where we discussed why he set the film in the United States, made the bold statement of blowing up the Lincoln Memorial and much more.

Thanks to @baroness_bodnar for the photos.

 

CIVIL WAR: 4 STARS. “jarring, bravura and pulse-racing filmmaking.”

“Civil War,” a new, near-future vision of dystopia from director Alex Garland, now playing in theatres, is an emotional and intellectual experience that plays like a stark prediction of what could happen if division and hate are allowed to run unchecked.

At the film’s beginning the President of the United States (Nick Offerman) predicts victory for the American government over the separatist “Western Forces” led by Texas and California. In reality, the Second American Civil War is waning as the rebellious W.F. cut a path to Washington, while the “Florida Alliance” leaves a bloody mark on other parts of the country.

How bad is it? In the movie’s sole light moment, to Canadian audiences at least, it’s revealed that the Canadian dollar is more valuable, and more in demand than USD. That’s how bad the situation is.

In the midst of this, journalists capture the story on film and in words. Kirsten Dunst is Lee, a seasoned photojournalist, who with writer Joel (Wagner Moura) has an eye on getting the biggest scoop of the conflict, an interview with the President.

“Interviewing him is the only story left,” she says.

As Lee and Joel, along with veteran New York Times journalist Sammy (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and ambitious combat photographer Jesse (Cailee Spaeny), set off on the 857-mile journey from New York to D.C., the full impact of the war’s destruction, on property and people, becomes clear.

“Every time I survived a war zone, I thought I was sending a warning home, ‘Don’t do this,’” Lee says, “but here we are.”

There are no monsters or supernatural aspects in “Civil War,” but make no mistake, this is a horror film. The horrors of war are detailed in a visceral and chaotic way—the rat-a-tat-tat of gun battles is deafening, while the cinema verité style shots of carnage and bodies left abandoned to rot in the sun stick in the imagination—but it is the idea of a societal collapse that haunts. “No one is giving orders,” says a soldier. “Someone is trying to kill us, and we’re trying to kill them.”

Garland uses thrilling, in-your-face imagery that brings to mind everything from classic war films to the handheld coverage of the Capitol attack of January 6, 2021 to paint a portrait of a country in combat with itself.

The director, who also wrote the script, is decidedly non-partisan in his approach to the story, emphasizing the cruelty of the movement, and the actions of the extremist militias, not the politics. In this version of civil war, the population are divided by ideology. Friends turn on friends, state on state, and wearing an orange “Press” Kevlar vest won’t keep the journalists safe. “They shoot journalists on sight at the capitol,” says Sammy. The ravages of this war, set against ordinary backdrops, like an abandoned Christmas theme park, or a deserted highway, are unsettling in a profound, unnerving way.

The jarring visuals—an opening protest scene is a jaw-dropper—enhanced by a pulsating, anxiety inducing electronic soundtrack are almost overwhelming, but underscore the importance of the journalists who risk their lives to record history in real time. The occasionally shocking situations and images—the final shot is a doozy, provocative and bound to be controversial—are powerful reminders of the risks undertaken by reporters on the search for the truth.

That risk factor, at a time when journalism is under fire, is highlighted in “Civil War,” but takes a backseat to Garland’s bravura, pulse-racing filmmaking.