Posts Tagged ‘Rolling Stones’

“Cocksucker Blues” screens on Friday, January 17 at the TIFF Bell Lightbox in Toronto

1303154788145_f(From Richard’s book, “The 100 Best Movies You’ve Never Seen,” ECW Press 2003)

“It’s a fucking good film, Robert, but if it ever shows in America we’ll never be allowed in the country again.” – Mick Jagger to director Robert Frank

You probably haven’t seen one of the best movies about rock and roll ever made, and Mick Jagger wants to make sure you never do. “Cocksucker Blues,” the legendary documentary about the Rolling Stones, is so raunchy it even made the Fab Five blush. Although it was produced with the full cooperation of the band, they still took director Robert Frank to court to block distribution.

The Rolling Stones first met the Swiss-born photographer Robert Frank at a mansion in Los Angeles during the sessions for “Exile on Main Street.” As Europeans they shared a common fascination with American culture. The Stones were walking encyclopedias of Southern blues, while Frank had travelled the States in the mid-1950s snapping a series of photographs that would be released as a book titled ”The Americans.” By the time of their meeting in 1972 the Stones were the biggest rock band in the world and “The Americans” was already regarded as one of the classic photography books of the century.

After their initial meeting Frank was hired to provide cover art for “Exile on Main Street.” He gave them a photo h had taken in 1950 of a collage of circus freaks from the wall of a tattoo parlor on Route 66. The cover photo was met with such critical acclaim that the Stones decided to expand theoir working relationship with rank and hired him to shoot a no-holds-barred documentary of their 1972 American tour, to be produced by the legendary owner of Chess Records, Mashall Chess.

The Stones had not performed I the U.S. since the December 1969 debacle at the Altamont Racetrack, the final date of the tour that was filmed by Albert and David Maysles and released as a full-length feature titled “Gimme Shelter.” Shot in the waning moments of the 1960s, “Gimme Shelter” not only documents the actual end of the decade, but it ideological end as well. During the Altamont concert the Hel’s Angels, hired as security by the Stones, used pool cues and knives to beat an 18-year-old African-American audience member to death. AS the band played “Under My thumb” and Meredith Hunter lay dying on the ground, the image profoundly signaled the end of the era of peace and love. It was an historical moment and the Rolling Stones had it on film.

“Gimme Shelter” is an above-average rockumenary, and the inclusion of the controversial Altamont footage assured it would be successful. Three years later it was time for a follow-up. Jagger decided to call the movie “Cocksucker Blues” after a rough-and-ready tune he had written about a gay hooker in London, and gave Frank a full access pass to shoot wherever and whatever he wanted. That was a decision that would later come back to haunt the band.

Frank chose to shoot the film cinema verite style in black and white (with the odd bity of colour thrown in), which lends a stark newsreel feel to the movie. His dispassionate eye neither judges nor comments, preferring the viewer to draw their own conclusions as he films Keith Richard’s descent into heroin addiction or a battered woman trying to hide her face from the camera. There are many outrageous sequences in the film: saxophonist Bobby Keyes and Keith indulge in one of the great rites of passage for any rock star—throwing a television out of a hotel window; Keith advises Mick on the best way to snort cocaine; naked groupies masturbate for the camera—and one gets the feeling they are genuine, despite the Stones’ later claim that Frank stages some of the more decadent scenarios. As part of a legal settlement with the band rank was forced to add a disclaimer at the beginning of the movie stating, “all scenes except the musical performances are fictitious.”

To my mind the thing that makes this documentary special, setting it heads above the other anything-that-is-worth-doing-is-worth0-over-doing music movies is not the sensational sex, drugs and rock and roll footage, but the shots of the band in the downtime between concerts. This, I suspect is the side the myth-hungry Rolling Stones didn’t want you to see.

Frank unblinkingly shows us the tedium of life on the road, and allows the real lives of the band members to be revealed. Mick, the ultimate rock star, for example, is seen trying to deal with his high maintenance wife Bianca, who is often seen crying and playing with a small music box. The band is shown killing time between gigs be ordering room service, engaging in inconsequential conversations, or simply not speaking at all. This was hardly the high glam life that would be expected from the “World’s Greatest Rock and Roll Band,” although these are the scenes that humanize the group and put a pinprick in the bubble of fame that surrounded the Stones in their glory days. Director Jim Jarmusch called “Cocksucker Blues” “definitely one of the best movies about rock and roll I’ve ever seen. It makes you think that being a rock star is one of the last things you’d ever want to do.”

There are also some great in-concert moments, although “Cocksucker Blues” is by no means a concert flick. In one memorable sequence Frank intercuts backstage antics at roadies snorting coke with the Stones on-stage, creating a hypnotic tableau that shows both the public and private dichotomy of the group and life on the road. Other standout performances include an “Uptight”/”Satisfaction” medley (with Stevie Wonder), “Happy” and “Street Fighting Man.”

The era when it would be possible to make a film like this showing a band at this level is over. Now publicists would run interference at every stop, and every media-savvy groupie would demand a release form and a fee. “Cocksucker Blues” may represent our last truly unfettered look into the lives of rock gods at the peak of their fame. The practice of celebrity journalism has been dealt a mortal blow by overzealous celebrity minders whose purpose in life is to sanitize their client’s images and make sure that compromising situations like the ones in the movie never make the light of day.

Not everyone agrees with my assessment of “Cocksucker Blues” as the greatest (and most revealing) rock movie ever, least of all the Rolling Stones. “I thought it was a piece of shit actually,” Bill Wyman, the Stones original bass player told me in 2001. “I thought it was so amateur and poorly done. I just couldn’t relate to it. [Robert Frank] was obviously just looking for anything sensational. That’s why me and Charlie are hardly in it, because we weren’t sensational. All the good bits, I thought, were cut out. It was just like a poor home movie, shot badly. I couldn’t relate to it. I had no interest in it really.”

The film has had very few public screenings. Frank’s vision of the rock and roll superstardom may have been too raw for the Stones, who sued to have the film shelved. Instead of suppressing the film completely, they reached a complicated settlement that allows Frank to show the film once a year, as long as he is in attendance. Bootleg copies—with a picture quality that “sucks as much as the groupies” as one critic joked—have bee widely distributed and are available for rent in many places.

UPDATE: “Cocksucker Blues” screens on Friday, January 17 at 6:30 p.m. at the TIFF Bell Lightbox in Toronto, and “Pull My Daisy” screens on Saturday, January 18 at 4:30 p.m as part of Hold Still – Keep Going: Films by Robert Frank — The Free Screen’s annual artists’ retrospective for 2014, running from January 17 to January 20. Programmer Chris Kennedy presents four programmes on the work of photographer and experimental filmmaker Robert Frank.  Although best known for his photographic series The Americans, Frank is also considered one of the most important independent filmmakers in post-war America.


080414_r17285_p465The Rolling Stones are one of the most documented bands in rock ‘n’ roll. A quick glance at IMDB has them headlining no fewer than a dozen documentaries and concert films, including an IMAX extravaganza. They’ve contributing to over 100 soundtracks and both Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have appeared on the big screen in acting roles. From their infancy the band has never met a camera they didn’t like and as a result it is possible to follow their progression from young blooze singing Turks to rock ‘n’ roll royalty while literally watching the wrinkles around Mick Jagger’s mouth and eyes blossom.

With such a wealth of archival footage already available the first question you ask when presented with a new concert film from the band is “Why?” Even with a director like Martin Scorsese behind the camera isn’t this simply an exercise in repetition?

The answer is yes and no, depending on your level of commitment to the ageless appeal of The Rolling Stones. If The Beatles were more your bag then Shine A Light will seem little more than a retread of the band’s greatest hits. If, however, you buy into the “greatest Rock ‘N’ Roll Band Ever” mantra the movie will be a chance to see a classic group, while maybe not exactly aging gracefully, at least proving that collecting a social security check doesn’t mean you still can’t rock the rafters.

Shot at New York’s Beacon Theatre in fall of 2006, the movie documents a two night stand in honor of Bill Clinton’s sixtieth birthday. The set list may seem familiar; Satisfaction, Jumpin’ Jack Flash, Start Me Up, Brown Sugar and no less than four tunes from Some Girls get dusted off, but it isn’t so much the songs as how the band plays the songs that impresses.

Forty plus years after their first gigs you don’t expect to hear the kind of raucous commitment to the music on display here. Jagger, who must have the smallest buttocks in the business, is as frenetically fey here as he was at his androgynous heyday in 1972. Watching him brought to mind a quote from Performance, his acting debut. “You’re a comical little geezer,” Chaz (James Fox) says to Jagger. “You’ll look funny when you’re fifty.” Bang on brother, but he’s still as compelling a front man as rock ‘n’ roll has ever produced.

Old dog Keith Richards prowls the stage, cigarette clenched in his teeth, guitar weaving effortlessly with second stringer Ronnie Wood. Because these two have been playing off one another for so long it is easy to forget how magical it can sound when they are in sync.

As a document of the Stones in the 21st century Shine a Light does a stylish job at presenting them as an impressive live band, but little else. It’s odd that Scorsese, whose Last Waltz is considered one of the great rock ‘n’ roll films of all time and whose Dylan doc elevated the music biography to epic proportions, didn’t seize the chance to provide some insight into the band or perhaps attempt to provide some social context. (Also odd is the exclusion of Gimme Shelter, a song Scorsese has used in three films, Goodfellas, Casino, and The Departed, but is conspicuously absent here.)

As it is it’s only rock ‘n’ roll, and that’s OK, it’s really good rock ‘n’ roll, but as a document of the group it doesn’t have the depth or support the repeated viewings of earlier Stones’ films like 1970’s Gimme Shelter. The newer, more unique material in the form of duets with a variety of musicians, ranges from the exciting Jack White / Jagger’s double teaming of Loving Cup, to classic a blast of blues from Buddy Guy to a downright creepy dirty dancing routine between Jagger and Xtina Aguilera, who is almost four decades his junior.

In the end Shine a Light is a completely unnecessary film, unless you are a Stones fan or need to be reminded of why Keith Richards is the coolest guitar slinger in rock ‘n’ roll history.